Vinden snur til fordel EAM: Høgsterett gir EAM medhold
EAM Solar ASA: Criminal Proceeding in Italy - Supreme Court has annulled the acquittal decision by the Appeal Court of Milan.
7 October 2021 The Supreme Court of Italy held a hearing on the 6th of October on the appeal of the acquittal sentence decided by the Milan Criminal Court of Appeal issued the 20th of January 2021. The Supreme Court of Cassation decided to annull the judgment of acquittal of the indicted by the Milan Court of Appeal, and consequently the criminal proceedings will return to the Milan Criminal Court of Appeal for new proceedings. As far as EAM understands this reinstates the validity of the first instance ruling from April 2019 whereby the Court of Milan found EAM to be victim of criminal contractual fraud in conjunction with the P31 acquisition. The detailed basis and arguments for the Supreme Court's decision will be published at a later date. The Italian Supreme Court of Cassation is the highest court of Italy. Appeals to the Court of Cassation generally come from the Appellate Court, the second instance courts. The Supreme Court can reject, or confirm, a sentence from a lower court. If it rejects the sentence, it can order the lower court to amend the trial and sentencing, or it can annul the previous sentence altogether.
7 October 2021 The Supreme Court of Italy held a hearing on the 6th of October on the appeal of the acquittal sentence decided by the Milan Criminal Court of Appeal issued the 20th of January 2021. The Supreme Court of Cassation decided to annull the judgment of acquittal of the indicted by the Milan Court of Appeal, and consequently the criminal proceedings will return to the Milan Criminal Court of Appeal for new proceedings. As far as EAM understands this reinstates the validity of the first instance ruling from April 2019 whereby the Court of Milan found EAM to be victim of criminal contractual fraud in conjunction with the P31 acquisition. The detailed basis and arguments for the Supreme Court's decision will be published at a later date. The Italian Supreme Court of Cassation is the highest court of Italy. Appeals to the Court of Cassation generally come from the Appellate Court, the second instance courts. The Supreme Court can reject, or confirm, a sentence from a lower court. If it rejects the sentence, it can order the lower court to amend the trial and sentencing, or it can annul the previous sentence altogether.
tuja
08.10.2021 kl 16:51
13813
Høyesterett i Italia annullerer dommen der fem personer ble frikjent for svindel mot EAM Solar
I januar i år frikjente en ankedomstol i Milano personer som tidligere var blitt dømt for svindel mot det norske solkraftselskapet EAM Solar.
Nå har Høyesterett i Italia har annullert dommen fra ankedomstolen i Milano.
EAM Solar hadde kjøpte flere solparker i Italia som inngikk i italiensk subsidieordning, og hadde garanterte inntekter i 20 år.
Etter kjøpet viste det seg at solcellene ikke var produsert i EU, men i Kina, og merket som om de var produsert i EU. Dermed ble kraftverkene kastet ut av den italienske subsidieordningen. Dermed ble også forutsetningen for EAM Solars kjøp av solparkene brutt.
Kraftverkene ble deretter stengt. Og EAM Solar har tapt store deler av investeringen.
I april 2019 ble fem personer dømt til fengselsstraffer på mellom tre og fem år for subsidiebedrageriene.
Investeringsselskapet og de tiltalte ble dømt til en midlertidig betaling på fem millioner euro.
Disse ble altså frikjent av ankedomstolen i Milano i januar 2020, men dommen er nå annullert av Høyesterett.
Selskapet skriver i en børsmelding i dag at deres forståelse nå er at dette gjenoppretter gyldigheten av kjennelsen som ble gitt i 2019 og at EAM ble utsatt for svindel i forbindelse med kjøpet av solcellene.
EAM Solar har også tatt ut et søksmål i Oslo tingrett mot det luxemburgske selskapet Enovos. EAM Solar ønsker å stille Enovos til ansvar for det selskapet mener er et storstilt investorbedrageri der det norske selskapet skal ha tapt milliarder.
I januar i år frikjente en ankedomstol i Milano personer som tidligere var blitt dømt for svindel mot det norske solkraftselskapet EAM Solar.
Nå har Høyesterett i Italia har annullert dommen fra ankedomstolen i Milano.
EAM Solar hadde kjøpte flere solparker i Italia som inngikk i italiensk subsidieordning, og hadde garanterte inntekter i 20 år.
Etter kjøpet viste det seg at solcellene ikke var produsert i EU, men i Kina, og merket som om de var produsert i EU. Dermed ble kraftverkene kastet ut av den italienske subsidieordningen. Dermed ble også forutsetningen for EAM Solars kjøp av solparkene brutt.
Kraftverkene ble deretter stengt. Og EAM Solar har tapt store deler av investeringen.
I april 2019 ble fem personer dømt til fengselsstraffer på mellom tre og fem år for subsidiebedrageriene.
Investeringsselskapet og de tiltalte ble dømt til en midlertidig betaling på fem millioner euro.
Disse ble altså frikjent av ankedomstolen i Milano i januar 2020, men dommen er nå annullert av Høyesterett.
Selskapet skriver i en børsmelding i dag at deres forståelse nå er at dette gjenoppretter gyldigheten av kjennelsen som ble gitt i 2019 og at EAM ble utsatt for svindel i forbindelse med kjøpet av solcellene.
EAM Solar har også tatt ut et søksmål i Oslo tingrett mot det luxemburgske selskapet Enovos. EAM Solar ønsker å stille Enovos til ansvar for det selskapet mener er et storstilt investorbedrageri der det norske selskapet skal ha tapt milliarder.
tuja
08.10.2021 kl 16:55
13836
Tar med disse refleksjonene fra ett annet forum også(i denne tråden). Følte det var greit å starte ny tråd, da premissene nå er totalt forandret:
EAM fikk opprinnelig medhold i at de ble utsatt for svindel og de 2 direktørene som var stevnet i saken ble dømt. I en så kompleks sak har det nok nå vært en liten bråte med høyesterettsdommere som har vurdert avgjørelsen fra Court of Appeal og funnet at enten var den i brudd med italiensk lov eller at saken faller utenfor rettens jurisdiksjon. Det første er nok mest sannsynlig.
Det blir nok en ny runde i Milan, hvor saken vurderes på nytt og avgjørelsen fra høyesterett tas til følge. Dog, kan EAM nå dytte hardt på annen sidestilt rettergang (LUX og NO) da de har en rettskraftig avgjørelse fra April 2019.
Den er anket, men de 5meur trenger vi ihvertfall ikke vente lenge på nå.
Nå må politimyndighetene komme på banen og få litt gjennomslagskraft her. Som tidligere nevnt tror jeg nok folk flest tar feil når de vurderer hvor kort vei det faktisk kan være til målstreken her…"
" Men de gikk til skrittet å annullere dommen, ikke bare sende tilbake med korrigeringer. De hadde mildere verktøy tilgjengelig de valgte å ikke benytte og det gir oss en god indikasjon på at 2. instans må gjøre betydelige endringer i sin avgjørelse.
Nå skal jo også Enovos advokat ha gitt svar på stevningen til Oslo Tingrett i September så regner med å få beskjed om at det blir en oppdatering angående dette også sett sakens utvikling:
"Oslo District Court has formally initiated the private criminal proceedings against Enovos Luxembourg SA. The
Norwegian legal counsel of Enovos, Thommessen, has been given until the 15 th of September to respond to the
formal indictment"
Og så har vi lovnad om EGF og en deal med Energeia for alle aksjonærer… Det blir en spennende høst dette."
EAM fikk opprinnelig medhold i at de ble utsatt for svindel og de 2 direktørene som var stevnet i saken ble dømt. I en så kompleks sak har det nok nå vært en liten bråte med høyesterettsdommere som har vurdert avgjørelsen fra Court of Appeal og funnet at enten var den i brudd med italiensk lov eller at saken faller utenfor rettens jurisdiksjon. Det første er nok mest sannsynlig.
Det blir nok en ny runde i Milan, hvor saken vurderes på nytt og avgjørelsen fra høyesterett tas til følge. Dog, kan EAM nå dytte hardt på annen sidestilt rettergang (LUX og NO) da de har en rettskraftig avgjørelse fra April 2019.
Den er anket, men de 5meur trenger vi ihvertfall ikke vente lenge på nå.
Nå må politimyndighetene komme på banen og få litt gjennomslagskraft her. Som tidligere nevnt tror jeg nok folk flest tar feil når de vurderer hvor kort vei det faktisk kan være til målstreken her…"
" Men de gikk til skrittet å annullere dommen, ikke bare sende tilbake med korrigeringer. De hadde mildere verktøy tilgjengelig de valgte å ikke benytte og det gir oss en god indikasjon på at 2. instans må gjøre betydelige endringer i sin avgjørelse.
Nå skal jo også Enovos advokat ha gitt svar på stevningen til Oslo Tingrett i September så regner med å få beskjed om at det blir en oppdatering angående dette også sett sakens utvikling:
"Oslo District Court has formally initiated the private criminal proceedings against Enovos Luxembourg SA. The
Norwegian legal counsel of Enovos, Thommessen, has been given until the 15 th of September to respond to the
formal indictment"
Og så har vi lovnad om EGF og en deal med Energeia for alle aksjonærer… Det blir en spennende høst dette."
Kadden
25.10.2021 kl 09:23
13264
Gleder meg til neste oppdatering fra selskapet. Spennende blir det å se hva som skjer videre i Oslo Tingrett og om de nå kan gjennoppta innkrevingen av den foreløpige erstatningen på 5M EUR og slå Aveleos konkurs.
Last79
01.11.2021 kl 09:47
13059
Håper vi får litt info om stevningen i Oslo Tingrett. Det er ca. 45 dager siden fristen 15.September.
tuja
02.11.2021 kl 13:33
12949
Nærmer seg at vi får litt mere kjøtt på beina:
Finanskalender
16 nov. Kvartalsrapport - Q3
Finanskalender
16 nov. Kvartalsrapport - Q3
tuja
11.11.2021 kl 13:18
12776
Jep, jepp. Da er det kun 2,5 handelsdager igjen før vi får en oppdatering i kv.rapporten. Egentlig merkelig at kursen ikke har gått merkbart oppover relatert til den supre meldingen de kom med for noen uker siden. EAM har nå en god støtte i rettslige prosedyrer, helt motsat av hva man trodde før meldingen. Alt ser mye lysere ut.
:)
:)
lolle02
11.11.2021 kl 15:06
12727
Burde stått i 35-40.-kr slik som før avslaget i rettsprosessen.
Nå er det avgjort av høyeste rettsinstans at det er svindel, la oppturen starte, kan bli en fin førjulsgave
Nå er det avgjort av høyeste rettsinstans at det er svindel, la oppturen starte, kan bli en fin førjulsgave
tuja
12.11.2021 kl 14:22
12645
EAM Solar ASA: Q3 Financial Report presentation on 16 November 2021
Newsweb
12 November 2021 EAM Solar ASA will hold an investor presentation in connection with its Q3 2021 Financial Report on 16 November 2021 at 10:00 CET. The presentation will be broadcasted using Zoom video conferencing. The presentation will be held by Viktor E Jakobsen, CEO of EAM Solar ASA. If you choose to join using Zoom, please dial in 5-10 minutes prior to the start time using the information below. Join Zoom Meeting: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/89663027277 Meeting ID: 896 6302 7277 The presentation material will be made available prior to the start of the presentation.
Newsweb
12 November 2021 EAM Solar ASA will hold an investor presentation in connection with its Q3 2021 Financial Report on 16 November 2021 at 10:00 CET. The presentation will be broadcasted using Zoom video conferencing. The presentation will be held by Viktor E Jakobsen, CEO of EAM Solar ASA. If you choose to join using Zoom, please dial in 5-10 minutes prior to the start time using the information below. Join Zoom Meeting: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/89663027277 Meeting ID: 896 6302 7277 The presentation material will be made available prior to the start of the presentation.
tuja
16.11.2021 kl 10:24
12491
Tydeligvis noe som har trigget kjøpersiden på videokonferansen som startet kl 10.00 :
16 November 2021
EAM Solar ASA will hold an investor presentation in connection with its Q3 2021
…
Vis børsmeldingen
Financial Report on 16 November 2021 at 10:00 CET. The presentation will be
broadcasted using Zoom video conferencing. The presentation will be held by
Viktor E Jakobsen, CEO of EAM Solar ASA.
If you choose to join using Zoom, please dial in 5-10 minutes prior to the start
time using the information below.
Join Zoom Meeting:
Launch Meeting - Zoom
16 November 2021
EAM Solar ASA will hold an investor presentation in connection with its Q3 2021
…
Vis børsmeldingen
Financial Report on 16 November 2021 at 10:00 CET. The presentation will be
broadcasted using Zoom video conferencing. The presentation will be held by
Viktor E Jakobsen, CEO of EAM Solar ASA.
If you choose to join using Zoom, please dial in 5-10 minutes prior to the start
time using the information below.
Join Zoom Meeting:
Launch Meeting - Zoom
tuja
16.11.2021 kl 12:14
12422
*Energeia AS intend to include the EAM Solar ASA shareholders in this development through a directed equity issue conducted in
such a way that all shareholders in EAM Solar ASA will receive one share in Energeia per share in ASA.*
Det er jo en fin gestus :)
such a way that all shareholders in EAM Solar ASA will receive one share in Energeia per share in ASA.*
Det er jo en fin gestus :)
topp20
16.11.2021 kl 12:27
12396
Jeg fikk ikke med meg zoom møtet, men skjønner at det var en ganske kortfattet affære. Var det noe spesifikt som ble sagt utover det vi visste fra før at man skulle får aksjer i Energeia ?
Last79
24.11.2021 kl 10:37
12128
Videoopptak av zoom møtet for Q3 ligger også ute på hjemmesiden til Eam eller youtube for de som ønsker å se hva som ble sagt.
tuja
02.12.2021 kl 08:32
11915
EAM Solar ASA: Full Supreme Court annulment of acquittal decision received
ANNEN INFORMASJONSPLIKTIG REGULATORISK INFORMASJON
Newsweb
2 December 2021 Reference is given to the Stock Exchange notice of the 7th of October 2021, whereby the Company was informed that the Supreme Court of Italy decided to annul the 20th of January 2021 judgment of acquittal by the Milan Criminal Court of Appeal in the subsidy fraud case against the State of Italy and contractual fraud against EAM Solar ASA. The Supreme Court has now issued its full decision for the annulment of the acquittal ruling. The original decision (in Italian language) is attached to this stock exchange notice. An English translation will be issued as soon as this is ready. The short summary of the reason for the Supreme Court to annul the Milan Appeal Court acquittal decision in its entirety is that the Supreme Court found that the Milan Appeal Court did not fulfil its obligation to conduct a correct and comprehensive review of the factual evidence in the criminal case, resulting in an erroneous evaluation of the evidence with the effect that the acquittal decision was based on obvious inconsistent and illogical arguments. The Supreme Court is sending the criminal case back to a different chamber of the Milan Appeal Court for a new proceeding in the criminal case with the requirement that the new court proceedings must proceed with a complete review of the evidence, making correct application of the principles of law and the rules of logic as formulated in the Supreme Court decision. On the fraud of EAM the Supreme Court concludes that the evidenced withholding of essential information during the contractual negotiations in itself constitute a contractual fraud.
ANNEN INFORMASJONSPLIKTIG REGULATORISK INFORMASJON
Newsweb
2 December 2021 Reference is given to the Stock Exchange notice of the 7th of October 2021, whereby the Company was informed that the Supreme Court of Italy decided to annul the 20th of January 2021 judgment of acquittal by the Milan Criminal Court of Appeal in the subsidy fraud case against the State of Italy and contractual fraud against EAM Solar ASA. The Supreme Court has now issued its full decision for the annulment of the acquittal ruling. The original decision (in Italian language) is attached to this stock exchange notice. An English translation will be issued as soon as this is ready. The short summary of the reason for the Supreme Court to annul the Milan Appeal Court acquittal decision in its entirety is that the Supreme Court found that the Milan Appeal Court did not fulfil its obligation to conduct a correct and comprehensive review of the factual evidence in the criminal case, resulting in an erroneous evaluation of the evidence with the effect that the acquittal decision was based on obvious inconsistent and illogical arguments. The Supreme Court is sending the criminal case back to a different chamber of the Milan Appeal Court for a new proceeding in the criminal case with the requirement that the new court proceedings must proceed with a complete review of the evidence, making correct application of the principles of law and the rules of logic as formulated in the Supreme Court decision. On the fraud of EAM the Supreme Court concludes that the evidenced withholding of essential information during the contractual negotiations in itself constitute a contractual fraud.
Hellboy
02.12.2021 kl 08:43
11886
Den var jo ganske så klar, den tilbakemeldingen fra høyesterett.
"On the fraud of EAM the Supreme Court concludes that the evidenced withholding of essential information during the contractual negotiations in itself constitute a contractual fraud."
Slik jeg leser den sier høyesterett ganske så klart at det er svindel, og at underliggende rettsinstans da må konkludere med det.
"On the fraud of EAM the Supreme Court concludes that the evidenced withholding of essential information during the contractual negotiations in itself constitute a contractual fraud."
Slik jeg leser den sier høyesterett ganske så klart at det er svindel, og at underliggende rettsinstans da må konkludere med det.
peterdawn
02.12.2021 kl 08:49
11864
Her har jeg kjørt dommen gjennom google translate. for dere som er interessert: https://www.dropbox.com/s/dcjgndy2gld93bv/Court%20of%20Cassation%20-%20unofficial%20copy.pdf?dl=0
peterdawn
02.12.2021 kl 08:55
11858
The Court of merit
it did not limit itself to excluding the accused's liability towards EAM
due to the alleged unawareness of the lack of access requirements
to the public incentive in relation to the plants sold, but has come to
to state that no such thing would occur in the course of the negotiations
"significant communication omission". Yet, according to the plaintiffs, the
information provided by both defendants in the course of the negotiations had
the legitimate access of the plants to the incentive tariffs of the
various Energy Accounts and the same, like the other representatives of Aveleos, had
denied that there were suitable conditions to lead to the forfeiture of the
benefit, by making communications on this crucial aspect objectively
untrue. The defense argues, in fact, the inadequacy of the assessment of
information acquired by the appellate judges, not having taken into account
of the continuous reassurances offered to the buyer's representatives about
the absolute groundlessness of the ongoing investigations on the plants.
it did not limit itself to excluding the accused's liability towards EAM
due to the alleged unawareness of the lack of access requirements
to the public incentive in relation to the plants sold, but has come to
to state that no such thing would occur in the course of the negotiations
"significant communication omission". Yet, according to the plaintiffs, the
information provided by both defendants in the course of the negotiations had
the legitimate access of the plants to the incentive tariffs of the
various Energy Accounts and the same, like the other representatives of Aveleos, had
denied that there were suitable conditions to lead to the forfeiture of the
benefit, by making communications on this crucial aspect objectively
untrue. The defense argues, in fact, the inadequacy of the assessment of
information acquired by the appellate judges, not having taken into account
of the continuous reassurances offered to the buyer's representatives about
the absolute groundlessness of the ongoing investigations on the plants.
peterdawn
02.12.2021 kl 08:56
11854
The leading companies add that the sentence also erroneously
considered that the letter from Viktor Jacobsen was sent on 03.26.2014 instead of
20.03.2014, when the minutes had not yet been drawn up and this error is
emblematic of the lack of rigor with which the Court examined the facts and reached it
to the decision arguing, finally, that the responsibility for the fraud suffered would be
by ascribing to the purchasing company with misrepresentation of the proof on the point since
the reconstruction of an alleged recklessness of EAM representatives during the course
negotiations are based on the use of non-existent evidence,
indicated as a decisive circumstance in the grounds of the appeal decision.
In conclusion, according to the plaintiffs, the contested decision is
vitiated by multiple omissions, errors and oversights, since
- denied the failure to complete the installations admitted to the tariffs
incentives of the Second Energy Bill by omitting the analysis of both the documents of
transport relating to shipments other than those covered by Paolo Russo's emails,
both of the provisions of the GSE for the revocation of the benefits;
- has misrepresented the univocal meaning of decisive evidential data, to evaluate
the full reliability of Vito Losurdo's testimony, such as the statements of
start-up of the plants of the Second Energy Account and the role held by
Alessandro Cavacece within the organization of Avelar and the companies
vehicle;
- attributed the nature of slander to self and hetero accusatory statements of
Vito Losurdo in the absence of any motivation;
considered that the letter from Viktor Jacobsen was sent on 03.26.2014 instead of
20.03.2014, when the minutes had not yet been drawn up and this error is
emblematic of the lack of rigor with which the Court examined the facts and reached it
to the decision arguing, finally, that the responsibility for the fraud suffered would be
by ascribing to the purchasing company with misrepresentation of the proof on the point since
the reconstruction of an alleged recklessness of EAM representatives during the course
negotiations are based on the use of non-existent evidence,
indicated as a decisive circumstance in the grounds of the appeal decision.
In conclusion, according to the plaintiffs, the contested decision is
vitiated by multiple omissions, errors and oversights, since
- denied the failure to complete the installations admitted to the tariffs
incentives of the Second Energy Bill by omitting the analysis of both the documents of
transport relating to shipments other than those covered by Paolo Russo's emails,
both of the provisions of the GSE for the revocation of the benefits;
- has misrepresented the univocal meaning of decisive evidential data, to evaluate
the full reliability of Vito Losurdo's testimony, such as the statements of
start-up of the plants of the Second Energy Account and the role held by
Alessandro Cavacece within the organization of Avelar and the companies
vehicle;
- attributed the nature of slander to self and hetero accusatory statements of
Vito Losurdo in the absence of any motivation;
peterdawn
02.12.2021 kl 08:57
11842
- excluded the indicative value of the metric calculations inherent to the plants of the
According to Conto Energia, moreover by resorting to irrelevant evaluation criteria
the legal proof of the civil trial;
- failed to evaluate the numerous evidential data enhanced by the sentence of
first care that demonstrates the central role of the accused (through the
company Avelar Energy, Avelar Management and Energetic Source) in the late
procurement of photovoltaic modules, in the construction of plants and in
request for incentive rates to the GSE
- denied the actual knowledge of Igor Akhmerov and Marco Giorgi
of the reasons that justified the searches at the offices of Aiòn, Ecoware ed
Helios of 19.12.12 - in evident contrast with the evidence of the opposite sign
acquired during the investigation - and the content of the summary report is misrepresented
testimonial information provided by Marco Giorgi on 20.11.12, in order to justify the
failure to take measures against Gianpiero Coppola after the
discovery of the fraudulent mechanism relating to the systems of the Fourth Account
Power;
- failed to confront the precise conclusions of the sentence of
Court, which had valued the functions performed by Igor Akhmerov and Marco
Giorgi within all the companies involved in the fraud (Energetic Source, Aiòn,
Helios, SAEM, vehicle company), also involving companies in which Gianpiero
Coppola (mistakenly considered the exclusive dominus of the scam mechanism)
he had no role;
According to Conto Energia, moreover by resorting to irrelevant evaluation criteria
the legal proof of the civil trial;
- failed to evaluate the numerous evidential data enhanced by the sentence of
first care that demonstrates the central role of the accused (through the
company Avelar Energy, Avelar Management and Energetic Source) in the late
procurement of photovoltaic modules, in the construction of plants and in
request for incentive rates to the GSE
- denied the actual knowledge of Igor Akhmerov and Marco Giorgi
of the reasons that justified the searches at the offices of Aiòn, Ecoware ed
Helios of 19.12.12 - in evident contrast with the evidence of the opposite sign
acquired during the investigation - and the content of the summary report is misrepresented
testimonial information provided by Marco Giorgi on 20.11.12, in order to justify the
failure to take measures against Gianpiero Coppola after the
discovery of the fraudulent mechanism relating to the systems of the Fourth Account
Power;
- failed to confront the precise conclusions of the sentence of
Court, which had valued the functions performed by Igor Akhmerov and Marco
Giorgi within all the companies involved in the fraud (Energetic Source, Aiòn,
Helios, SAEM, vehicle company), also involving companies in which Gianpiero
Coppola (mistakenly considered the exclusive dominus of the scam mechanism)
he had no role;
peterdawn
02.12.2021 kl 08:57
11834
- provided an illogical reconstruction, detached from the proceedings of the trial of the
e-mail sent by Sebastiano Maggi to Marco Giorgi regarding the replacement of the
plates on the PV panels, claiming that it could not refer to the
replacement of labels certifying the false Italian origin of the panels
Chinese, in contrast to the univocal evidence in the documents;
- omitted any reference to the accounting and technical devices used for
make the installed panels of Chinese origin appear as MADE IN EU products
in the En.F0.14 plant, excluding the
structure of the complex fraud committed against the GSE and the EAM companies;
- denied any communication omission on the part of Igor Akhmerov e
Marco Giorgi during the negotiations for the sale of the so-called Portfolio 31 a
EAM, in contrast to the literal tenor of documents - never communicated to the
counterpart and in the availability of Aveleos - in which details on the
methods of carrying out fraud (replacement of the label affixed to the forms
photovoltaics from outside the EU to be installed on the national territory);
e-mail sent by Sebastiano Maggi to Marco Giorgi regarding the replacement of the
plates on the PV panels, claiming that it could not refer to the
replacement of labels certifying the false Italian origin of the panels
Chinese, in contrast to the univocal evidence in the documents;
- omitted any reference to the accounting and technical devices used for
make the installed panels of Chinese origin appear as MADE IN EU products
in the En.F0.14 plant, excluding the
structure of the complex fraud committed against the GSE and the EAM companies;
- denied any communication omission on the part of Igor Akhmerov e
Marco Giorgi during the negotiations for the sale of the so-called Portfolio 31 a
EAM, in contrast to the literal tenor of documents - never communicated to the
counterpart and in the availability of Aveleos - in which details on the
methods of carrying out fraud (replacement of the label affixed to the forms
photovoltaics from outside the EU to be installed on the national territory);
peterdawn
02.12.2021 kl 08:58
11839
- found an alleged negligence of the representatives of the EAM civil parties
during the negotiations on the basis of a glaring mistake, assuming that the letter
sent by Viktor Jacobsen on 03/20/2014 was dated 03/26/2014.
The lawyer Maria Grazia Stocco in the interest of Pilotto Giuseppina
5. The incorrect application of art. 8 cpp and the contradiction of the
motivation with regard to the territorial incompetence of the Milan Ag.
According to the defense the Court of Appeal was wrong in finding correctly determined the territorial jurisdiction at the Milan Ag since, had
with regard to the associative case pursuant to art. 416 of the Italian penal code originally
disputed, the place of conception and planning of the illicit activities of
partnership was to be identified at the Milan office of Avelar Management Ltd.
According to the defense, on the contrary, the competent authority had to be identified in
Court of Brescia since in the district of said Court and, above all, in
Paderno Franciacorta the association had shown its effectiveness,
resulting in deeds that Avelar Energy, Aveleos knows and all the owner companies
of the plants sub B) had their domicile or headquarters in Paderno Franciacorta, the same
Akmerov had his domicile in Italy in that city and the current accounts of the
various companies owning the fields on which the disbursements were credited
public were opened at Brescia banks. In the alternative
the competent authority should have been identified in that of Bari from
moment that the Pisicoli, Lagonigro and Masiello plants owned by Energetic
Source Solar Production and Enovos Solar Investments II, located in Gravina di Puglia
and Poggiorsini, were the first to enjoy the incentive rates in March 2011;
during the negotiations on the basis of a glaring mistake, assuming that the letter
sent by Viktor Jacobsen on 03/20/2014 was dated 03/26/2014.
The lawyer Maria Grazia Stocco in the interest of Pilotto Giuseppina
5. The incorrect application of art. 8 cpp and the contradiction of the
motivation with regard to the territorial incompetence of the Milan Ag.
According to the defense the Court of Appeal was wrong in finding correctly determined the territorial jurisdiction at the Milan Ag since, had
with regard to the associative case pursuant to art. 416 of the Italian penal code originally
disputed, the place of conception and planning of the illicit activities of
partnership was to be identified at the Milan office of Avelar Management Ltd.
According to the defense, on the contrary, the competent authority had to be identified in
Court of Brescia since in the district of said Court and, above all, in
Paderno Franciacorta the association had shown its effectiveness,
resulting in deeds that Avelar Energy, Aveleos knows and all the owner companies
of the plants sub B) had their domicile or headquarters in Paderno Franciacorta, the same
Akmerov had his domicile in Italy in that city and the current accounts of the
various companies owning the fields on which the disbursements were credited
public were opened at Brescia banks. In the alternative
the competent authority should have been identified in that of Bari from
moment that the Pisicoli, Lagonigro and Masiello plants owned by Energetic
Source Solar Production and Enovos Solar Investments II, located in Gravina di Puglia
and Poggiorsini, were the first to enjoy the incentive rates in March 2011;
topp20
02.12.2021 kl 08:58
11841
JA - Høyesterett sier at dette er en svindel, men dette har vi jo visst lenge. Dog er jeg enig med Hellboy at dette er en viktig konklusjon som ikke kan gjentas for ofte.
Det viktigste jeg leste var følgende: "the acquittal decision was based on obvious inconsistent and illogical arguments". WOW ! Dette er ikke bare en bemerkning over vurderinger som høyesterett er uenig i. De sier at Milano Appeal court BEVISST har dømt i favør svindlerne. Man skal huske at Appeal Court beslutningen var veldig delt, men med favør svindlerne. I realiteten er dette en kamp mot mafiaen og vi får vel ha såpass tiltro til Italiensk rettsvesen at Høyesterett ikke er "eiet" av mafiaen.
Dermed har Høyesterett sendt saken til et annet kammer og implisitt sagt at man vil følge nøye med på at jobben nå blir gjort. Like viktig som at de vil følge med kommer instruksen "requirement that the new court proceedings must proceed with a complete review of the evidence". Dette er STORT for EAM - for nå krever Høyesterett at all bevisførsel skal kunne fremmes for retten. Og da er det jo HELT GENIALT at EAM har igangsatt sin egen etterforskning som skal kunne benyttes iht vanlige rettsprinsipper. EAM sine advokater kan dermed fotfølge etterforskningen på hvert eneste steg av veien.
Nå ble jeg stålbull !
Det viktigste jeg leste var følgende: "the acquittal decision was based on obvious inconsistent and illogical arguments". WOW ! Dette er ikke bare en bemerkning over vurderinger som høyesterett er uenig i. De sier at Milano Appeal court BEVISST har dømt i favør svindlerne. Man skal huske at Appeal Court beslutningen var veldig delt, men med favør svindlerne. I realiteten er dette en kamp mot mafiaen og vi får vel ha såpass tiltro til Italiensk rettsvesen at Høyesterett ikke er "eiet" av mafiaen.
Dermed har Høyesterett sendt saken til et annet kammer og implisitt sagt at man vil følge nøye med på at jobben nå blir gjort. Like viktig som at de vil følge med kommer instruksen "requirement that the new court proceedings must proceed with a complete review of the evidence". Dette er STORT for EAM - for nå krever Høyesterett at all bevisførsel skal kunne fremmes for retten. Og da er det jo HELT GENIALT at EAM har igangsatt sin egen etterforskning som skal kunne benyttes iht vanlige rettsprinsipper. EAM sine advokater kan dermed fotfølge etterforskningen på hvert eneste steg av veien.
Nå ble jeg stålbull !
peterdawn
02.12.2021 kl 09:00
11931
Beklager spam her. Dere burde lese dommen! Men Court of Milan får faen meg gjennomgå!
peterdawn
02.12.2021 kl 09:31
11902
Høysterett sier jo basicly at EAM ble svindlet: Så Victor fikk altså rett til slutt..
With regard to Chapter F), in which the Akhmerov is accused of having been silent,
in competition with Giorgi, the lack of conditions for admission to the regime of
incentive rates paid by the GSE on the occasion of the sale to the EAM group
Solar of numerous project companies, the Court of Appeal has correctly found
that the acquittal of the fraudulent conduct contested in chapters B) and D)
of the rubric could only lead to liberating results also in relation to the boss
Nonetheless, he decided to exclude the existence of significant omissions
communication in contractual negotiations, giving account of the reasons for this
conviction with broad motivation.
With regard to Chapter F), in which the Akhmerov is accused of having been silent,
in competition with Giorgi, the lack of conditions for admission to the regime of
incentive rates paid by the GSE on the occasion of the sale to the EAM group
Solar of numerous project companies, the Court of Appeal has correctly found
that the acquittal of the fraudulent conduct contested in chapters B) and D)
of the rubric could only lead to liberating results also in relation to the boss
Nonetheless, he decided to exclude the existence of significant omissions
communication in contractual negotiations, giving account of the reasons for this
conviction with broad motivation.
Hellboy
02.12.2021 kl 10:10
11850
VI har visst det lenge, men det er utrolig viktig at italiensk høyesterett sier det så krystallklart som de har gjort.
Og som alle innleggene til peterdawn viser, så får jo virkelig retten i Milano gjennomgå. Personlig har jeg aldri sett så klar tale fra en rettsinstans som det høyesterett gjør her. Det er jo massiv slakt av retten i Milano. Greit nok at jeg ikke jobber med jus, men man får jo med seg en del fra media angående dommer etc, og ikke engang de polariserte rettsavgjørelsene i statene er i nærheten av å bruke slikt språk i en totalslakt av en annen rettsinstans
Og som alle innleggene til peterdawn viser, så får jo virkelig retten i Milano gjennomgå. Personlig har jeg aldri sett så klar tale fra en rettsinstans som det høyesterett gjør her. Det er jo massiv slakt av retten i Milano. Greit nok at jeg ikke jobber med jus, men man får jo med seg en del fra media angående dommer etc, og ikke engang de polariserte rettsavgjørelsene i statene er i nærheten av å bruke slikt språk i en totalslakt av en annen rettsinstans
andreast
06.12.2021 kl 14:45
11569
Noen som kan forklare meg hvorfor aksjekursen går nedover etter børsmeldingen forrige torsdag? Har selv brukt anledningen til å fylle på. Med nært forestående utdeling av Energeia aksjer og en soleklar bekreftelse i høyesterett på at EAM har blitt svindlet ville jeg tro at kursen skulle begynne å bevege seg oppover..
Mattelæreren
06.12.2021 kl 14:50
11566
Skjønner godt det faller jeg. Det er Italia. Italienske rettsaker er vel ikke antatt å være helt uten mafia etc. Og det er fremdeles en laaaaang vei og gå med et usikkert resultat.
Og mange andre aksjer å velge i som er trygge og stiger og mye sikrere fremtidsutsikter
Og mange andre aksjer å velge i som er trygge og stiger og mye sikrere fremtidsutsikter
Kadden
07.12.2021 kl 16:59
11502
Jeg tror aksjekursen generelt faller fordi det er få mennesker som kjenner caset inngående. Selv om ting ser svært lovende ut framover, og det absolutt er mulighet for en lykkelig slutt, så det er fortsatt usikkerhet om hvor lang tid det vil ta. Dette preger nok kursen også. Personlig har jeg økt beholdningen de siste ukene. Jeg er bull etter siste fra høyesterett. Det blir spennende å se om det blir sak i oslo tingrett. Blir det sak vil EAM få mulighet til å legge fram ALT av beviser, det har de ikke hatt mulighet til å gjøre fram til nå.
tuja
04.01.2022 kl 10:12
10818
Nærmer seg nyheter igjen i EAM:
Skjul EAM Solar ASA: Translated Supreme Court decision and date set for Oslo District Court hearing on fraud case against Enovos Luxembourg SA.
ANNEN INFORMASJONSPLIKTIG REGULATORISK INFORMASJON
Newsweb
22 December 2021 Translated Italy Supreme Court ruling Reference is given to the Stock Exchange notice of the 2nd of December 2021. Attached to this stock exchange notice is the certified English translation of the full Italian Supreme Court decision of the 6th of October 2021. Hearing in Oslo District Court in the fraud case against Enovos Luxembourg SA Oslo District Court has decided to conduct a court hearing in the fraud case against Enovos Luxembourg SA. The hearing is expected to take place in Oslo District Court on the 31st of January and 1st of February 2022. Oslo District Court will decided if the fraud charges shall go to main trial proceedings following the hearing.
Skjul EAM Solar ASA: Translated Supreme Court decision and date set for Oslo District Court hearing on fraud case against Enovos Luxembourg SA.
ANNEN INFORMASJONSPLIKTIG REGULATORISK INFORMASJON
Newsweb
22 December 2021 Translated Italy Supreme Court ruling Reference is given to the Stock Exchange notice of the 2nd of December 2021. Attached to this stock exchange notice is the certified English translation of the full Italian Supreme Court decision of the 6th of October 2021. Hearing in Oslo District Court in the fraud case against Enovos Luxembourg SA Oslo District Court has decided to conduct a court hearing in the fraud case against Enovos Luxembourg SA. The hearing is expected to take place in Oslo District Court on the 31st of January and 1st of February 2022. Oslo District Court will decided if the fraud charges shall go to main trial proceedings following the hearing.
Fiskesuppe
05.01.2022 kl 16:50
10688
Se for deg alle negative overskrifter om EAM blir spilt av etter hverandre, med dramatisk musikk til. En god fortellerstemme presenterer EAMs juridiske mølje i ekte og ryddig «JCS»-stil (youtube). En historie om tålmodighet, dedikasjon og rettferdighet mot alle odds: «EAM pulveriserer svindlerne, yiha!».
Det finnes ørten grunner til å ikke involvere seg i EAM Solar. Men kom igjen ’a! Hvorfor er det ikke flere som lar seg rive med her? Artig å se at det er mange av de samme som skriver i forumet. Selv har jeg vært inne og ute av aksjen flere ganger. Som dere alle vet har jo dette holdt på en del år. Nå har jeg kjøpt mitt siste lodd. Og det skal jeg aldri selge.
Takk til Kadden og co for flotte bidrag her i forum. Jeg er en av dem som hyppig leser hva dere skriver, men som oftest holder meg i bakgrunnen.
Det finnes ørten grunner til å ikke involvere seg i EAM Solar. Men kom igjen ’a! Hvorfor er det ikke flere som lar seg rive med her? Artig å se at det er mange av de samme som skriver i forumet. Selv har jeg vært inne og ute av aksjen flere ganger. Som dere alle vet har jo dette holdt på en del år. Nå har jeg kjøpt mitt siste lodd. Og det skal jeg aldri selge.
Takk til Kadden og co for flotte bidrag her i forum. Jeg er en av dem som hyppig leser hva dere skriver, men som oftest holder meg i bakgrunnen.
tuja
28.01.2022 kl 14:16
10242
Utsatt, men får ny, legal status oppdatering neste uke:
Skjul EAM Solar ASA: Legal Status update - Oslo District Court hearing postponed due to sickness
ANNEN INFORMASJONSPLIKTIG REGULATORISK INFORMASJON
Newsweb
28 January 2022 Reference is given to stock exchange notice of the 22nd of December 2021. EAM Solar ASA was informed today by the Oslo District Court administration that the hearing in the private criminal proceedings against Enovos Luxembourg SA in Oslo District Court scheduled for Monday the 31st of January and Tuesday the 1st of February has been postponed due to sickness. The Court has not set a new date. EAM Solar ASA will revert with a general status update during next week.
Skjul EAM Solar ASA: Legal Status update - Oslo District Court hearing postponed due to sickness
ANNEN INFORMASJONSPLIKTIG REGULATORISK INFORMASJON
Newsweb
28 January 2022 Reference is given to stock exchange notice of the 22nd of December 2021. EAM Solar ASA was informed today by the Oslo District Court administration that the hearing in the private criminal proceedings against Enovos Luxembourg SA in Oslo District Court scheduled for Monday the 31st of January and Tuesday the 1st of February has been postponed due to sickness. The Court has not set a new date. EAM Solar ASA will revert with a general status update during next week.
topp20
29.01.2022 kl 20:23
10215
Tipper det er trenering fra motparten.
De har virkelig ikke lyst til å få en dom i Oslo mot seg.
De har virkelig ikke lyst til å få en dom i Oslo mot seg.
tuja
25.02.2022 kl 08:36
9802
EAM Solar ASA: Q4 Financial Report presentation on 1 March 2022
HALVÅRSRAPPORTER OG REVISJONSBERETNINGER / UTTALELSER OM FORENKLET REVISORKONTROLL
Newsweb
25 February 2022 EAM Solar ASA will hold an investor presentation in connection with the Q4 2021 Financial Report on 1 March 2022 at 11:00 CET. The presentation will be broadcasted using Zoom video conferencing. The presentation will be held by Viktor E Jakobsen, CEO of EAM Solar ASA. If you choose to join using Zoom, please dial in 5-10 minutes prior to the start time using the information below. Join Zoom Meeting: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81889941496 Meeting ID: 818 8994 1496 The presentation material will be made available prior to the start of the presentation.
HALVÅRSRAPPORTER OG REVISJONSBERETNINGER / UTTALELSER OM FORENKLET REVISORKONTROLL
Newsweb
25 February 2022 EAM Solar ASA will hold an investor presentation in connection with the Q4 2021 Financial Report on 1 March 2022 at 11:00 CET. The presentation will be broadcasted using Zoom video conferencing. The presentation will be held by Viktor E Jakobsen, CEO of EAM Solar ASA. If you choose to join using Zoom, please dial in 5-10 minutes prior to the start time using the information below. Join Zoom Meeting: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81889941496 Meeting ID: 818 8994 1496 The presentation material will be made available prior to the start of the presentation.
topp20
01.03.2022 kl 11:58
9662
kjøpte meg litt opp i dag etter q4 presentasjonen. De har nå to rettsaker (Oslo + Milano) som virker som blir den endelige konklusjonen på dette. Begge disse kommer opp i 2022. Oppgjøret får vi i 2023. Sannsynlighet for suksess anser jeg nå for 50% - og det oppgjøret vi får er 100% oppside. Dagens market cap er p.t. utelukkende de eiendeler EAM faktisk besitter. I tillegg gir Energeiea aksjene vi får tildelt ved fisjonen en grei oppside fra dagens aksjeverdi
tuja
01.03.2022 kl 12:04
9675
Ja, kan bli ett fint "oppgjør" i 2023. Og enig i at det er en gratis opsjon med tildeling av aksjer i Energia. Det blir vel 1 aksje tildelt for hver vi har i EAM? Tror det blir litt mere interesse rundt EAM utover året. Kanskje ikke så dumt å handle ferdig på dagens nivå.
tuja
07.03.2022 kl 12:36
9459
Anbefaler alle som har interesse for EAM å høre på denne videolinken fra kv.rapporten. Her er det mye spennende på gang i løpet av H1-2022:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxQkEh0v4gE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxQkEh0v4gE