Erstatningen blir ett faktum, gratulerer

lolle02
EAM 18.10.2021 kl 09:23 9411

Med nyheten om at Eam vant frem i Høyeste rettsinstans i Milano, så er det ikke spørsmål om tid, men når.
Her er muligheter for å kunne flerdoble innsatsen på relativt kort tid.
Utbetaling av foreløpig erstatning er rett rundt hjørnet.
pmanmph
28.03.2025 kl 09:42 1586

I'm HMInvest using this nick during the weekend. Travelling, and forgot my login.

This is what I see technically; price trading in a fib 50-63 retracement, so in my chart it seems to by a good timing again for new buy. Don't expect price to drop much lower.

Info regarding update/progress meeting is coming up shortly, there is a lot to inform.
Redigert 28.03.2025 kl 10:31 Du må logge inn for å svare
Gullhaugen
28.03.2025 kl 09:57 1535

LOAD UP NOW AND HOLD!!

According to EAM’s latest annual report, the consequences of the decision of the state-owned operator Gestore dei Servizi Energetici amount to more than €300m.
https://delano.lu/article/enovos-faces-court-over-160m-d
Redigert 28.03.2025 kl 09:58 Du må logge inn for å svare
Gullhaugen
28.03.2025 kl 10:14 1479

WHAT WOULD IT BE PER SHARE IF THEY GET 3 BILLION INCLUDING INTEREST. THEY ARE ENTITLED TO INTEREST
Tony83
28.03.2025 kl 10:21 1442

So the civil claim against Enovos will be decided not in the Supreme Court of Italy but in a separate procedure in Norway?
HP17
28.03.2025 kl 10:47 1367

EAM kommer nok til å gå som en kule fremover mot 17.06.
Og nå som motparten er under press vil det heller ikke overraske om et forlik inngås innen 17.06?
Uansett, win win frem til 17.06 på dagens kursnivå er min vurdering
Redigert 28.03.2025 kl 10:52 Du må logge inn for å svare
MC Axel
24.04.2025 kl 09:14 979

I agree!

EAM has a strong case and people can earn a lot of money here in a short time

I sit here quietly and wait
MC Axel
25.04.2025 kl 09:42 826

EAM is currently flying under the radar and is totally undervalued

The company is currently worth a ridiculous 88 million NOK on the stock exchange.


The EAM compensation claim is 2.5 billion NOK, which is a lot more than 88 million

It was big news when the Supreme Court took up the case. It showed that EAM has something to gain.

It's cheap!



https://www.finansavisen.no/nyheter/industri/2021/10/07/7749216/fikk-italiensk-hjelp-i-milliardkampen
Redigert 25.04.2025 kl 09:47 Du må logge inn for å svare
Tony83
26.04.2025 kl 11:08 676

I am also disappointed with the price development! I am pretty confident that on 17.06.2025 a positive decision will come AND what is even more important --> the civil law claim for damages was in fact filed in this criminal procedure, so EAM will be awarded money!
Tony83
27.04.2025 kl 12:17 442

Dear MC Axel, let's try to go in more detail. My question was "has EAM filed a civil law claim for damages in criminal proceedings?" Look what ChatGDP has answered me:
"was the civil law claim for damages also filed by EAM Solar in the criminal law case?"

Yes, it was.

In Italy, it’s very common for a **civil claim for damages** (called *costituzione di parte civile*) to be **joined inside a criminal trial**. That’s exactly what happened here:
**EAM Solar ASA** formally joined the **criminal case** against Igor Akhmerov, Marco Giorgi, and others **as a civil party**, claiming financial damages from the alleged fraud.

When a civil party joins a criminal case in Italy, the criminal court can decide **both** on the criminal responsibility **and** on **civil liability for damages** at the same time.
That’s why, even when Akhmerov and Giorgi were later acquitted of some charges in appeal (July 2024), the court **still confirmed** the civil liability of some companies (like **Aveleos SA** and **Avelar Management**) towards EAM Solar, because Italian law allows civil damages to be awarded even if the criminal case ends without a conviction (e.g., due to statute of limitations or other technicalities).

In short:
✅ **EAM Solar filed its damages claim inside the criminal case**
✅ **The criminal court handled both the criminal charges and EAM’s civil damages claim**
✅ **Civil liability** was confirmed **even if criminal guilt was not fully upheld** for some points.

Would you like me to explain also the difference between the criminal court damages and the arbitration award they got separately? It’s pretty interesting how those two are connected! 🚀