MONSTER SHORT SQUEEZE IS COMING NOW

🥳🥳🥳

@Gh, ser ikke sånn ut!! Vi er fortsatt langt unna 0,30!!

More than 10% of all shares in the company have now been traded today!

This means that more than 23% of all shares in two days!

This stock has the potential

I think we will have another strong SEAPT day today, with high trading volume!

I am convinced that SEAPT will be the next EAM/Zenith stock. It has all the same characteristics. SEAPT also has a solid and good case on their side.

It should be bought now, when it is well below 1 NOK, which means it is cheap!

For me this is a no brainer, its just a matter of time before it will rally hard

Loks like the konsolidering is son finish, the buyers is bilding up😎

👍

Those who are patient here will benefit big time!

Det lades opp på mikro volum nå, spørsmålet er når starter algoene opp igjen. Akkumuleringen er forhåpentligvis snart ferdig. Tålmodighet vil nok betale seg rimelig geit her😉

SEAPT has gone up +61.83% in one week and that's good. Now it has accumulated +0.20 NOK, which is strong

I have steadily increased the stock and now have a few million shares and only time will tell if it was wise

Good luck!

SEAPT is acting strange today. Don't be surprised if we get news this week!

@MCA, what kind of news do you expect MCA??

More about this:

Seacrest Petroleo presents debt reorganization plan
28th April 2025 12:27 PM

By Lucy Monteiro

Seacrest Petroleo has submitted its debt restructuring plan to a Sao Paulo court, according to a court document dated 25 April.

The Brazilian independent oil and gas production company is proposing asset sales to repay creditors. If the asset-sales process does not take place during a certain period set in the plan, secured and unsecured creditors would be repaid with profit-sharing bonds."


And more about the arbitration case and its progress

Samme for meg når tid.... Men kommer garantert over 1 kr før rettsaken 💰💰

Tør ihvertfall ikke sitte utenfor da den plutselig 🚀🚀

Mista tålmodigheten i EAM etter å kjøpt på 30 øre og den ble liggende mellom 40/60 øre en god periode... Plutselig nesten 2 kr 😱

Her skal jeg ikke løpe etter og ha is i magen 🥳

Kjøper heller mer og ingen problemer å vente mot Aug 😁

🎯🤑🤑🎯

Kan raskt komme en kanon melding lenge før også 😉

Oljepris 69!?!? Det lover svært godt for SEAPT. Hele grunnen til at de er i den situasjonen de er i, er jo pga oljeprisen. Nå med en stigende pris så vil reprisingen her ingen ende ta. Kan vi se 2-tallet før august? Ja!

Oljeprisen burde ha gitt noe brensel for raketten 😎

I've sold my small position, after reading the case more thoroughly. Too many questions. Even if they win in august the mess with the ceditors still needs to be sorted. I don't see 1 nok coming, at least not based on fundamenta. Big risk on this one. Only my take on this.

Kommer forventnings rally mot rettsak i aug 😉

Kan bli dyrt å stå utenfor 🙈

Selvfølgelig ikke all in 🥳

800 millioner......👏👏

Tja, hvor dyrt det er å stå utenfor er vel litt vrien....
Men hvor dyrt det er å være på straffebenken er nok ett større spørsmål?
Kanskje ikke helt uten risiko her?

Hadde det ikke vært noe risiko her så hadde kursen vært i 10 kroner 😅 tipper seapt skal opp mot krona før 8 august 😎

@unikum, ja denne aksjen er mer enn høy høy risiko!! Hva han mener med dyrt å stå utenfor er litt vanskelig å forstå for her står kreditorene i kø etter rettsaken så hvem tørr stå løpet ut er mitt spørsmål?? Har hørt om og lest om dette rallyet som skal komme så og si hver dag men jeg velger å stå på perrongen!! :))

Se på EAM, er konk om de taper rettsaken. Allikevel er den priset til 200 mil før rettsaken som kommer neste uke

There is a major difference between SEAPT and EAM.
EAM has already been looked into by the Supreme Court, 2021. It was in favor of EAM. If EAM wins on Tuesday it is not a matter if they will receive damage claim, but how much it will be. The Civil Court will obey the Supreme Courts order and basically just decide on the size of the claim.
SEAPT may win or loose the upcoming trial. There are no hints to what decision the court may conclude. If SEAPT wins, next major obstacle is the creditors, which is a mess.

Tror du glemmer hvilke krefter forventninger har. Seapt skal nok pumpes noen 100 prosenter før avgjørelsen 8 august 😉

EAM has 12 times its current market cap.
SEAPT has max 7 times it's current market cap, then there is the major obstacle - credit

I agree! 👍

Oljeprisen har gått veldig i natt og kan stige veldig mye mer om dette eskalere i Midtøsten

Tia er nok inne for å eie small cap oljeselskap, de kommer til å vegg i mellom om olje pris forsetter

Skal det bli algo fest i dag 🤷‍♂️😎

Kjekt om en algo er short her😎

You who even consider buying this stock -whats your thoughts about the major issues with the creditors.

There is maximum 71 USD on the table, which is about s i x times current MC. And you are trying to fool people that share will rice t e n times current MC.
If, and that's a big IF, they win, creditors that basically owns the assets has to be handled. How?

Stop pumping this mess and crap.

So, bottom line. You, potential owner, are you prepared to by MCAxels t e n times current MC, when maximun stake in court is s i x times current MC. Will you buy at 0.5 nok, or even worse 1 nok? I garantee, if you do, you will be fooled.

I bet you (MCAxel etc) who are pumping the stock already sits on 100% gain, and you are trying to fool people to another 400-1000%. Give me a brake!

You shouldn't get personal, neither I nor anyone else is out to hurt you. We are investors just like you and if the price went down in EAM, it was hardly my fault.

SEAPT also has assets that can be sold to cover creditor debts. Read the company's announcement.

And SEAPT has a claim for damages of +71 million dollars. Here I believe in a settlement, but not certain

Time will tell

Not personal, just look at the facts in the case. I've split it up in A) Court decision and B) creditors.

What does A) contain?
The court decision (arbitration) :
Ongoing arbitration. Hearing date for the petition dated for the winding up of the Company on the 8 August.
2025. SEAPT against Petrobas.
- SEAT claim 71.2 USD in damage caused by Petrobas, by not fullfilling their obligations to restore pipelines within reasonable time.
- Petrobas has claim on SEAPT, approximately USD 71. However, claim temporarily barred by Rio de Janeiro court as from enforcing the payment by SEAPT.
Hence, SEAPT wants 71.2 MUSD due to damage, and in addition the supspension of Petrobas claim on SEAPT of 71 MUSD.

What does B) contain?
Creditors:
B) Kraken credit agreement and enforcement of the pledge of shares of the Company’s subsidiary Seacrest Petroleo Cricare Bermuda Limited. The Company is committed to recovering on behalf of its creditors and shareholders the difference between the aggregate value of any assets that are sold by the Kraken lenders or their agents and the value of the debt secured by the pledge of shares that the lenders enforced on.

After considering a variety of strategic options, the Company's Board of Directors has determined that a provisional liquidation in Bermuda is the optimal method of enforcing the Company’s rights and recovering maximum value for creditors and shareholders. Accordingly, the Company has requested that the Supreme Court of Bermuda appoint representatives of EY as joint provisional liquidators based on the firm’s relevant experience and track record of success.

Outcome in A)
1. SEAPT wins both the damage claim and the claim by Petrobas. Hence, max win 71.2 mUSD.
2. SEAPT wins the damage claim but not the claim by Petrobas. Hence, win 0 mUSD.
3. SEAPT lose the damage claim but win the claim by Petrobas. Hence win 0 mUSD
4. SEAPT lose both damage claim and the claim by Petrobas. Hence, max loss - 71mUSD debt.

In either of the outcomes in A) SEAPT has to deal with the creditors in B). Hence, even if SEAPT win/lose A) they may lose everytning in B).

Thank you for these informative comments about SEAPT HMPInvest and MCA. Personally, i have a good feeling that SEAPT will win the case against Petrobas, even though i have not read the contractual agreement between the two parties (nor will i get access to it). Let me break down why i believe that SEAPT will win:

The reason why i think SEAPT have a good case is first of all since they actually went through the process of filing a law suit against them through the ICC arbitration. The information that is available to the public suggest that the pipelines were heavily delayed and most importantly, not successfully maintained which resulted in delayed delivery and lower quality of oil that were sold.

Now, as previously quoted, we do not know the specifics of the contract as we do not have access to it, but we can (and must) assume that SEAPT have been very specific in the contract about due date of when the pipes should have been maintained/restored and the quality of the work carried out by Petrobas. It is likely that Petrobas have not fulfilled the contractual agreement.

You might ask "why we must assume" that SEAPT have been specific about these very important factors in the contract? Well, that is common sense if you ask me and should under any circumstance be detailed in such a major contractual agreement.

Following my topic of why SEAPT have a strong case against Petrobas, we can look at statistics where Petrobas have been involved in arbitration cases. As you can see, 4 have been lost 2 have been settled and 2 have been won. Of course each case is separate to this specific one, but going back to my statement that SEAPT went through the process of the ICC arbitration, i do not believe that they would do so if they felt that they have a weak case.

In summary i think that SEAPT will win the case but i would not get surprised if it gets settled in the near future.

Now, the big question is what factors does it bring to the table in case that SEAPT actually ends up winning the case? The company could be restructured, pay debt, have a better cash flow, investors would be more attracted etc etc. There are so many positive factors and the stock value would boost (a lot).
Please take a minute to read through the below information which supports my comments. These are all actual facts.

🔍 Overview: Petrobras Arbitration Cases – Statistics and Outcomes

Petrobras has been involved in multiple high-profile arbitration cases over the past two decades. Based on publicly available data, the company has lost or settled more major arbitration cases than it has won.

Summary Table of Key Cases:

Case / Counterparty Outcome Amount Involved
Vantage Drilling (2018) ❌ Lost USD 622–700 million
Astra Oil / Pasadena (2009–12) ❌ Lost USD 820 million
Odebrecht / Braskem (2023) ❌ Lost USD 162 million
IESA Oil & Gas (2021) ❌ Lost USD 70 million
Unigel (2024) 🤝 Settled Amount undisclosed
EIG Energy Fund XIV (2025) 🤝 Settled USD 283 million
Shareholder Actions (Lava Jato) ✅ Won Claims dismissed
Class Arbitration (Brazil) ✅ Won Case dismissed on grounds

Conclusion: In major contractual disputes (especially involving operations or contracts abroad), Petrobras has often been on the losing side or has opted for settlements.

⸻

⚖️ ICC Arbitration: Final and Binding Decisions

The arbitration between Seacrest Petroleo and Petrobras is being handled by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), one of the world’s leading arbitration institutions.

Key Characteristics:
• Finality: ICC awards are final and binding.
• No Appeal: There is no appeal process for an ICC arbitral award. Once rendered, the decision cannot be challenged on its legal or factual findings.
• Limited Set-Aside: Awards may only be challenged in the courts of the seat of arbitration on very narrow procedural grounds, such as:
• Arbitrator bias or conflict of interest
• Due process violations (e.g., a party not given a fair chance to present its case)
• Award exceeds the scope of the arbitration clause
• Violation of public policy

These challenges are rare, difficult to prove, and most courts around the world are reluctant to interfere with arbitral awards.

⸻

🇧🇷 Does Petrobras Have an Advantage Given the Dispute Is on Brazilian Soil?

This is nuanced.

Potential Advantages for Petrobras:
• Familiar legal and technical environment: The dispute concerns pipeline maintenance and infrastructure at the Norte Capixaba terminal in Brazil – a location under Petrobras’s historical operational domain.
• Access to local technical data and experts: Petrobras may have stronger command over documentation, personnel, and local operational history.
• Regulatory familiarity: Brazilian environmental and technical regulations may play a role in interpreting contractual obligations – where Petrobras could argue from precedent or local interpretation.

But There Are Limits:
• The case is not being decided under Brazilian courts, but through international arbitration. So:
• Local influence is minimized
• Neutrality of ICC arbitration is preserved
• International arbitrators are unlikely to favor a party simply based on geography, especially if the contract specifies neutral governing law or international standards for maintenance obligations.

Conclusion:

While Petrobras might benefit from technical familiarity with the pipeline infrastructure, the legal playing field remains neutral under ICC rules. This limits any strategic advantage tied to national terrain or jurisdiction.

A really good summary of the case, thank you! 👍

Now we know why SEAPT has fallen recently. Cobas Asset Management, SGIIC, S.A. fell below 5% threshold has sold. It is not certain that they will sell the rest, but they have approx. 20 - 26 million shares left. you can expect that they may have sold on Friday. It is certainly for strategic reasons.

26 million sounds like a lot, but it's not, at these low prices. Once they have sold their share, I'm sure the stock will strengthen again and it could be as early as this week. Today, 7 million shares have already been traded.


I'm not panicking. I'll take the opportunity and buy more SEAPT shares at these levels.


https://newsweb.oslobors.no/message/649218

Tar vi utgangspunkt i forrige rapport (q3 2024) for Seacrest så hadde de en gjennomsnittlig oljepris 60,8 USD per fat. I 2025 har vi ligget godt over dette nivået.
Nå har vi en oljepris som ligger 20% over og garanterer et overskudd etter kostnader. Noe som tilsier at videre drift er det ingen tvil det er liv laget for.

Begynner å nærme seg tomme nå cobas. På tide å begynne å plukke her tenker eg

Vil tro cobas er ferdig I morgen formiddag